What the tech

Search

/ opens search from anywhere. Esc closes it.

Tools

Get the newsletter

review-pr: a Claude Code skill by Warp

For teams running automated PR reviews in CI who want structured JSON output instead of direct GitHub posts. Skip it if you want Claude to comment on a PR by hand.

Score
68of 100
Rank
#193of 239
Installs
29.2Kon skills.sh
Security
Mixed 3 scanners
Updated
2026
Context
~72tokens always

Install

npx skills add https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills --skill review-pr

Run it in your terminal. View the source

Using the Claude app rather than Claude Code? You can add a skill there too. How to add it in the app

What does review-pr do?

review-pr is a skill from Warp that reviews a checked-out pull request and writes its findings to review.json for a workflow to publish. It reads pr_diff.txt with [OLD:n] and [NEW:n] line annotations, pr_description.txt and an optional spec_context.md. It weighs correctness, security, error handling, performance, comment quality and tests, and looks for a repo-specific review-pr-local companion skill. Each comment carries a CRITICAL, IMPORTANT, SUGGESTION or NIT label, and nits need a GitHub suggestion block. Before a verdict, it audits every changed comment and test against the repo's guidelines. A bundled Python validator checks line numbers, and posting to GitHub directly is forbidden.

When should you use review-pr?

Use it when

  • Your CI hands the agent a PR diff to review
  • You want review output as machine-readable JSON
  • You keep repo-specific review rules in a companion skill

Skip it when

  • You review PRs live in a chat session
  • Your pipeline doesn't produce pr_diff.txt

What it needs and what it can touch

You need

  • A CI workflow that supplies pr_diff.txt and publishes review.json
  • Python 3 for the validator script

What it can do

  • Reads the checked-out repository and diff files
  • Writes review.json
  • Runs a bundled Python validator

From reading its instructions, not from running it.

Why it scores 68

Strongest on upkeep (100 of 100), weakest on adoption (41).

  • Adoption35 points 41
  • Upkeep20 points 100
  • Trust20 points 60
  • Quality15 points 100
  • Reader answers10 points Not enough answers yet, so this does not count

How the formula works

Is review-pr safe to install?

At least one scanner raised a medium warning. Read the results below. Scanners often miss what other scanners catch, and a skill can change after a scan. Read its source before you install it.

ScannerResultDate
Gen Agent Trust HubPassedSep 15, 2026
SocketPassedSep 15, 2026
SnykMedium riskSep 15, 2026

Details

Installs
29,163
Repository stars
695
Last repository change
Tokens always loaded
about 72
Tokens when used
about 2,516
License
MIT
Data confidence
High

Alternatives to review-pr

All skills for this job