review-pr: a Claude Code skill by Warp
For teams running automated PR reviews in CI who want structured JSON output instead of direct GitHub posts. Skip it if you want Claude to comment on a PR by hand.
- Score
- 68of 100
- Rank
- #193of 239
- Installs
- 29.2Kon skills.sh
- Security
- Mixed 3 scanners
- Updated
- 2026
- Context
- ~72tokens always
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills --skill review-pr Run it in your terminal. View the source
Using the Claude app rather than Claude Code? You can add a skill there too. How to add it in the app
What does review-pr do?
review-pr is a skill from Warp that reviews a checked-out pull request and writes its findings to review.json for a workflow to publish. It reads pr_diff.txt with [OLD:n] and [NEW:n] line annotations, pr_description.txt and an optional spec_context.md. It weighs correctness, security, error handling, performance, comment quality and tests, and looks for a repo-specific review-pr-local companion skill. Each comment carries a CRITICAL, IMPORTANT, SUGGESTION or NIT label, and nits need a GitHub suggestion block. Before a verdict, it audits every changed comment and test against the repo's guidelines. A bundled Python validator checks line numbers, and posting to GitHub directly is forbidden.
When should you use review-pr?
Use it when
- Your CI hands the agent a PR diff to review
- You want review output as machine-readable JSON
- You keep repo-specific review rules in a companion skill
Skip it when
- You review PRs live in a chat session
- Your pipeline doesn't produce pr_diff.txt
What it needs and what it can touch
You need
- A CI workflow that supplies pr_diff.txt and publishes review.json
- Python 3 for the validator script
What it can do
- Reads the checked-out repository and diff files
- Writes review.json
- Runs a bundled Python validator
From reading its instructions, not from running it.
Why it scores 68
Strongest on upkeep (100 of 100), weakest on adoption (41).
Is review-pr safe to install?
At least one scanner raised a medium warning. Read the results below. Scanners often miss what other scanners catch, and a skill can change after a scan. Read its source before you install it.
| Scanner | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Gen Agent Trust Hub | Passed | Sep 15, 2026 |
| Socket | Passed | Sep 15, 2026 |
| Snyk | Medium risk | Sep 15, 2026 |
Details
- Installs
- 29,163
- Repository stars
- 695
- Last repository change
- Tokens always loaded
- about 72
- Tokens when used
- about 2,516
- License
- MIT
- Data confidence
- High
Did it do the job for you?
Alternatives to review-pr
All skills for this job-
Get code-review-and-qualitycode-review-and-quality
For developers who want a structured review of a diff or pull request before merging.
-
Get thermo-nuclear-code-quality-reviewthermo-nuclear-code-quality-review
For developers who want a very strict maintainability review of a branch that pushes for big simplifications.
-
Get gstackgstack
For people running Garry Tan's gstack workflows on Capy cloud machines or Claude Code.
-
Get diff-intakediff-intake
For teams adding analytics tracking who want a PR turned into a YAML change brief.