thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review: a Claude Code skill by Cursor
Official
For developers who want a very strict maintainability review of a branch that pushes for big simplifications. Skip it if you want a quick, gentle review or a bug and security hunt.
- Score
- 73of 100
- Rank
- #148of 239
- Installs
- 24.1Kon skills.sh
- Security
- Clear 3 scanners
- Updated
- 2026
- Context
- ~71tokens always
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/cursor/plugins --skill thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review Run it in your terminal. View the source
Using the Claude app rather than Claude Code? You can add a skill there too. How to add it in the app
What does thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review do?
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review is a skill from Cursor's plugin set that runs a harsh code quality audit of the current branch's changes. It only runs when you call it by name. Claude looks for restructurings that keep behavior but delete whole branches, layers or helpers, and treats several things as blockers: a file pushed past 1,000 lines, ad hoc conditionals in unrelated flows, thin wrappers, needless casts or any, duplicated helpers, and logic in the wrong layer. Findings are ranked from structural regressions down to legibility, with few high-conviction comments instead of nits. It withholds approval while an obvious simpler path goes unused.
When should you use thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review?
Use it when
- A large branch has grown messy before merge
- You suspect a simpler design exists for a change
- Files are creeping past 1,000 lines
Skip it when
- You need bugs or security issues found
- You want a light review of a small change
What it needs and what it can touch
You need
- A git branch with changes to review
What it can do
- Reads the branch's changes and related code
From reading its instructions, not from running it.
Why it scores 73
Strongest on upkeep (100 of 100), weakest on adoption (44).
Is thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review safe to install?
Every scanner that checked it passed it. Scanners often miss what other scanners catch, and a skill can change after a scan. Read its source before you install it.
| Scanner | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Gen Agent Trust Hub | Passed | Jun 12, 2026 |
| Socket | Passed | Jun 12, 2026 |
| Snyk | Low risk | Jun 12, 2026 |
Details
- Installs
- 24,131
- Repository stars
- 15,973
- Last repository change
- Tokens always loaded
- about 71
- Tokens when used
- about 3,022
- License
- Not stated
- Data confidence
- High
Did it do the job for you?
Alternatives to thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review
All skills for this job-
Get code-review-and-qualitycode-review-and-quality
For developers who want a structured review of a diff or pull request before merging.
-
Get simplifysimplify
For TypeScript and React developers who want freshly written code tidied without behavior changes.
-
Get security-reviewsecurity-review
For developers who want a security review of a file or diff that reports only confirmed, exploitable flaws.
-
Get ponytail-reviewponytail-review
For developers who want a plain-English review of a change that ends in a ship or fix verdict.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review